Contemplation & Composition

socopolitics:

No comments necessary

(Source: asderathos)

brightblue-citylights:

I tend to be more conservative when it comes to politics.

You might say I’m

image

usually right.

(via socopolitics)

sallyfredericktudor:

fuck-liberal-morons:

What the fuck ever retards. You need photo ID (which can be obtained for free) to do virtually anything as an adult. It IS NOT voter suppression to require it to vote in a federal election. The only people this practice actually stops from voting are illegals and dead people, who shouldn’t be voting anyway.

OMG, she is a freaking IDIOT!! She obviously does not know her history! Jim Crow was about keeping the blacks from voting! Dumb Ass, it is not about race! It is about RIGHT and WRONG! You cannot do anything or get anything without a valid photo ID! Like it has been said over and over again….it is about stopping the FRAUD…like Ovomit used to CHEAT his way into the W.H.!! NO MORE DEAD PEOPLE AND ILLEGALS VOTING!! 

Yes, she is wrong. Asking that American citizens present photo ID when voting, as they do for most anything else, is in no way conspiratory. If anything, it prevents a great deal of voter fraud, such as the 2214 voters over the age of 110 found in North Carolina, a majority of which were Democrat. As for the Jim Crow laws, she is also misinformed. It was again the Democratic party that was behind the laws. The Republican party originally formed to, in part, work to abolish slavery, and they have continued to be on the same side of the “race” argument since their inception, more or less. However, we can present the facts in a calm and rational manner, and remember that even if a given person proves himself an idiot, he is still a human being and deserves to be treated as such. Let’s retain a bit of civility here, please. 

sallyfredericktudor:

fuck-liberal-morons:

What the fuck ever retards. You need photo ID (which can be obtained for free) to do virtually anything as an adult. It IS NOT voter suppression to require it to vote in a federal election. The only people this practice actually stops from voting are illegals and dead people, who shouldn’t be voting anyway.

OMG, she is a freaking IDIOT!! She obviously does not know her history! Jim Crow was about keeping the blacks from voting! Dumb Ass, it is not about race! It is about RIGHT and WRONG! You cannot do anything or get anything without a valid photo ID! Like it has been said over and over again….it is about stopping the FRAUD…like Ovomit used to CHEAT his way into the W.H.!! NO MORE DEAD PEOPLE AND ILLEGALS VOTING!! 

Yes, she is wrong. Asking that American citizens present photo ID when voting, as they do for most anything else, is in no way conspiratory. If anything, it prevents a great deal of voter fraud, such as the 2214 voters over the age of 110 found in North Carolina, a majority of which were Democrat. As for the Jim Crow laws, she is also misinformed. It was again the Democratic party that was behind the laws. The Republican party originally formed to, in part, work to abolish slavery, and they have continued to be on the same side of the “race” argument since their inception, more or less. 

However, we can present the facts in a calm and rational manner, and remember that even if a given person proves himself an idiot, he is still a human being and deserves to be treated as such. Let’s retain a bit of civility here, please. 

(Source: questionall, via independent-conservatives)

Public Education: A True Story….

talkstraight:

image

image

image

image

Yep. The Department of Education has done more to dummy down our kids and turn them into the weak willed zombies that they’ve become for years now. It’s no wonder why they spend 99% of their day staring slack jawed into their cells phones and worshiping the ground of idiot celebrities. Makes them easier to control that way while the money they generate line the pockets of their masters.

Been there, done that. NEVER going to deal with public schools. Again. 

(via socopolitics)

socopolitics:

therealashleydionne:

Tyranny of the majority.Save the Republic.

but but… Democracy!
I was forced to endure a Michael Moore film the other day in which a professor likened socialism to democracy :P

Democracy can only be a temporary state of government, which eventually devolves either into some form of oligarchy (where a powerful few control the many) or anarchy, where there is mob rule. Anarchy tends to fall back towards an oligarchy as well. Democracy is just a stepping stone to greater government control. It is only when both the people and the government are subject under the rule of law, as in a true Rebuplic, can liberty even hope to exist. 

socopolitics:

therealashleydionne:

Tyranny of the majority.


Save the Republic.

but but… Democracy!

I was forced to endure a Michael Moore film the other day in which a professor likened socialism to democracy :P

Democracy can only be a temporary state of government, which eventually devolves either into some form of oligarchy (where a powerful few control the many) or anarchy, where there is mob rule. Anarchy tends to fall back towards an oligarchy as well. Democracy is just a stepping stone to greater government control. It is only when both the people and the government are subject under the rule of law, as in a true Rebuplic, can liberty even hope to exist. 

ponies-and-politics:

literally goosebumbs.

That last one… I have some customers at my job who are like that, though they’d never say so out right. A few old navy vets… God bless them. I can’t even imagine…

(Source: rubaiyatxcix, via independent-conservatives)

loveyouramerica:

secondworldwarineurope:

"On the last Sunday of April 1945, the first Allied soldier, an American scout of Polish descent, came through the gate of the main Dachau camp. The few Nazis in the tower watched apprehensively. They were no longer there as guards; they had been ordered to stay on merely to complete the formalities of surrender. The upper ranks had already fled, to blend in among the German civilian population. The young American’s first impression, later detailed in an interview, was one of `glaring chaos,’ thousands of ragged skeletons, in the yard, in the trees, waving little rags, climbing over one another, hysterical, completely out of control The scout went back for support and returned with a small detatchment. The flags of many Allied nations had suddenly appeared. Apparently the prisoners had been secretly piecing them together over the months, from tatters and patches and strips of cloth. One prisoner, a Polish priest, exuberantly kissed an officer, learning later to his glee that she was Marguerite Higgins, of the New York `Herald Tribune,’ the first American war correspondent to report on Dachau. A military chaplain came forward and asked that all who could do so join him in a prayer of thanksgiving.

Soon the advance scouts were joined by other Allied soldiers and one of the German guards came forward to surrender with what he believed would be the usual military protocol. He emerged in full regalia, wearing all his decorations. He had only recently been billeted to Dachau from the Russian front. He saluted and barked `Heil Hitler.’ An American officer looked down and around at mounds of rotting corpses, at thousands of prisoners shrouded in their own filth. He hesitated only a moment, then spat in the Nazi’s face, snapping `Schweinehund,’ before ordering him taken away. Moments later a shot rang out and the American officer was informed that there was no further need for protocol.

Some of the Nazis were rounded up and summarily executed along with the guard dogs. Two of the most notorious prison guards had been stripped naked before the Americans arrived to prevent them from slipping away unnoticed. They, too, were cut down. General Eisenhower sent a laconic communique from headquarters: `Our forces liberated and mopped up the infamous concentration camp at Dachau. Approximately 32,000 prisoners were liberated; 300 SS camp guards were quickly neutralized.’

During the next few days as the burials went forward, the sick and the dying were transferred to hospital facilities, makeshift as they had to be, and food was carefully distributed. `Prescribed’ might be the better word, for the starving had to adjust their food intake with medical discipline. Only then did the American command turn to review the files that the Germans, with characteristic meticulousness, had maintained.

The full record of the pseudo-medical experimentations came to light. Prisoners had been used as laboratory animals, without the humane restrictions placed on vivisection. Hannah Arendt suggested that `the camp was itself a vast laboratory in which the Nazis proved that there is no limit to human depravity.’ For it was remembered that these experiments were not planned or conducted by identifiable psychopaths. They were performed or supervised by professional scientists, trained in what had been once considered peerless universities and medical schools. Reverend Franklin Littell called them `technically competent barbarians.’ Indeed the procedures had the full approval and cooperation of Berlin’s Institute of Hygiene.” 

Source:  Sachar, Abram L. The Redemption of the Unwanted. New York: St. Martin’s/Marek, 1983.

crying.
reblog this. keep it as a record to show those bastards that deny the holocaust.

It could happen again.

cultureshift:

"Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion."
- Ronald Reagan

AMEN

cultureshift:

"Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion."

- Ronald Reagan

AMEN

(Source: by-grace-of-god, via socopolitics)

Tumblr Poll:

whatiscapitalism:

Reblog this if you would vote for Rand Paul over Hillary Clinton.

(via liberallogic101)